LFoundry Data Shows that BSI Sensors are Less Reliable than FSI - Hallo friendsCAR ON REPIYU, In the article you read this time with the title LFoundry Data Shows that BSI Sensors are Less Reliable than FSI, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article car review, Article mobile review, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : LFoundry Data Shows that BSI Sensors are Less Reliable than FSI
link : LFoundry Data Shows that BSI Sensors are Less Reliable than FSI

LFoundry Data Shows that BSI Sensors are Less Reliable than FSI

LFoundry and Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, publish open source paper in IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society "Performance and reliability degradation of CMOS Image Sensors in Back-Side Illuminated configuration" by Andrea Vici, Felice Russo, Nicola Lovisi, Aldo Marchioni, Antonio Casella, and Fernanda Irrera. The data shows that BSI sensors' lifetime in a specific discussed failure mechanism is 150-1,000 times shorter than FSI. Of course, there can be many other failure sources that mask this huge difference.

"We present a systematic characterization of wafer-level reliability dedicated test structures in Back-Side-Illuminated CMOS Image Sensors. Noise and electrical measurements performed at different steps of the fabrication process flow, definitely demonstrate that the wafer flipping/bonding/thinning and VIA opening proper of the Back-Side-Illuminated configuration cause the creation of oxide donor-like border traps. Respect to conventional Front-Side-Illuminated CMOS Image Sensors, the presence of these traps causes degradation of the transistors electrical performance, altering the oxide electric field and shifting the flat-band voltage, and strongly degrades also reliability. Results from Time-Dependent Dielectric Breakdown and Negative Bias Temperature Instability measurements outline the impact of those border traps on the lifetime prediction."

"TDDB measurements were performed on n-channel Tx at 125C, applying a gate stress voltage Vstress in the range +7 to +7.6V. For each Vstress several samples were tested and the time-to-breakdown was measured adopting the three criteria defined in the JEDEC standard JESD92 [21]. For each stress condition, the fit of the Weibull distribution of the time-to-breakdown values gave the corresponding Time-to Failure (TTF). Then, the TTFs were plotted vs. Vstress in a log-log scale and the lifetime at the operating gate voltage was extrapolated with a power law (E-model [22]).

NBTI measurements were performed on p-channel Tx at 125C, applying Vstress in the range -3 to -4V. Again, several Tx were tested. Following the JEDEC standard JESD90 [23], in this case, lifetime is defined as the stress time required to have a 10% shift of the nominal VT. The VT shift has a power law dependence on the stress time and the lifetime value at the operating gate voltage could be extrapolated."

"Noise and charge pumping measurements denoted the presence of donor-like border traps in the gate oxide, which were absent in the Front-Side Illuminated configuration. The trap density follows an exponential dependence on the distance from the interface and reaches the value 2x10e17 cm-3 at 1.8 nm. Electrical measurements performed at different steps during the manufacturing process demonstrated that those border traps are created during the process loop of the Back-Side configuration, consisting of wafer upside flipping, bonding, thinning and VIA opening.

Traps warp the oxide electric field and shift the flat-band voltage with respect to the Front-Side configuration, as if a positive charge centroid of 1.6x10e-8 C/cm2 at 1.7 nm was present in Back-Side configuration, altering the drain and gate current curves.

We found that the donor-like border traps affect also the Back-Side device long term performance. Time Dependent Dielectric Breakdown and Negative Bias Temperature Instability measurements were performed to evaluate lifetime. As expected, the role of border traps in the lifetime prediction is different in the two cases, but the reliability degradation of Back-Side with respect to Front-Side-Illuminated CMOS Image Sensors is evident in any case."

Thus Article LFoundry Data Shows that BSI Sensors are Less Reliable than FSI

That's an article LFoundry Data Shows that BSI Sensors are Less Reliable than FSI This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article LFoundry Data Shows that BSI Sensors are Less Reliable than FSI with the link address https://caronrepiyu.blogspot.com/2020/06/lfoundry-data-shows-that-bsi-sensors.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: