Chronoptics compares depth sensing methods - Hallo friendsCAR ON REPIYU, In the article you read this time with the title Chronoptics compares depth sensing methods, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article car review, Article mobile review, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Chronoptics compares depth sensing methods
link : Chronoptics compares depth sensing methods

Chronoptics compares depth sensing methods

In a blog post titled "Comparing Depth Cameras: iToF Versus Active Stereo" Refael Whyte of Chronoptics compares depth reconstructions from their indirect time-of-flight (iToF) "KEA" camera with active stereo using an Intel RealSense D435 sensor.

Specs

Setup used for comparisons

Bin picking

Pallet picking

Depth data can also be overlaid on RGB to get colored point cloud visualizations. KEA provides much cleaner-looking results:

 

KEA

D435

They show some limitations too. In this scene the floor has very low reflectivity in IR so the KEA camera struggles to collect enough photons there:

 

[PS: I wish all companies showed "failure cases" as part of their promotional materials!]

Full article here: https://medium.com/chronoptics-time-of-flight/comparing-depth-cameras-itof-versus-active-stereo-e163811f3ac8

Thus Article Chronoptics compares depth sensing methods

That's an article Chronoptics compares depth sensing methods This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Chronoptics compares depth sensing methods with the link address https://caronrepiyu.blogspot.com/2022/06/chronoptics-compares-depth-sensing.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: